The Doomsday Clock and Culling the Herd


The Doomsday Clock is a dubious but symbolic invention by the scientists who built the first atom bomb. Having built it they seem to have realised how dangerous it was to their own existence. Unlike other scientific methods of killing their fellow human beings – think: human culling, vaccines, GMOs, chemical food additives, addictive and destructive prescribed medications, radiation, eugenics, and forced sterilization – atomic bombs are indiscriminate, killing scientists and proles’ alike.

It seems the bomb has been replaced by more insidious subtle killers: For those unfortunates who believe that scientists don’t like killing people…May I suggest The Blue Planet’s, David Attenborough:
Sir David Attenborough: ‘British Eugenics Needed to Cull World Population’

David Attenborough – Humans are plague on Earth

The idea behind the Doomsday Clock was for scientists to keep an eye on things science-related that may also kill us all (like climate change) and to see if they could ease the problem. Judging by the clock today in 2018, they have wasted their time for seventy years, but then non-achievement is not a subject scientists tend to dwell on.

bulletinBulletin of the Atomic Scientists
It’s 2 Minutes to Midnight
The Bulletin was founded in 1945 by Manhattan Project scientists who “could not remain aloof to the consequences of their work.” The organization’s early years chronicled the dawn of the nuclear age and the birth of the scientists’ movement, as told by the men and women who built the atomic bomb and then lobbied with both technical and humanist arguments for its abolition.

I would normally add a Wiki reference to this article, but in this case the editor seems to either have a problem with the English language or has completely taken leave of his senses. But then most of these people are paid-up members of skeptical organisations and anything that fails to equate with their own clockwork universe does not exist. The notion that science, the source of their beloved “facts”, is going to blow them all to hell would lead to a complete mental meltdown:
Wiki: As of January 2018, the Clock is set at two minutes to midnight, due to global threat of nuclear war, the United States not being involved in world leadership roles, and climate change.

David Attenborough

Reducing the population via the methods suggested above by Attenborough would, by my own estimation take two hundred years minimum. As he is quite old I would suggest he has other plans for us that he can’t talk about in public? He has mentioned human culling in the past, but websites with a transcript seem to have disappeared.

The great intelligence test Importantly, the genocidal properties of vaccines, GMOs, chemical food additives, medications and other synthetic chemicals function as a sort of intelligence test for the population. Those who routinely take vaccines are, of course, stupid. Removing the stupid people — the “useless eaters” — from the gene pool is one of the goals of the global controllers. Thus, vaccine propaganda serves as the perfect filter for removing “stupid genes” from the human gene pool. This is no doubt why globalists so aggressively push vaccines on low-income families — they equate “low income” with “not qualified to reproduce.” Read it all at the link below:

We can only assume that Wiki editors will be the first to go?


Eric Pianka, American Biologist Texas Academy of Science – speech
Wiki: Pianka’s acceptance speech[12] for the 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist Award from the Texas Academy of Science[13] resulted in a controversy in the popular press when Forrest Mims, vice-chair of the Academy’s section on environmental science, claimed in the Society for Amateur Scientists e-journal The Citizen Scientist that Pianka had “endorsed the elimination of 95 percent of the human population” through a disease such as an airborne strain of the Ebola virus. Mims claimed that Pianka said the Earth would not survive unless its population was reduced by 95% suggesting that the planet would be “better off” if the human population were reduced and that a mutant strain of Ebola would be the most efficient means. Mims’ affiliate at the Discovery Institute, William Dembski, then informed the Department of Homeland Security that Pianka’s speech may have been intended to foment bioterrorism.[14] This resulted in the Federal Bureau of Investigation interviewing Pianka in Austin.

Eugenics - Popular Science
Eugenics – Popular Science

Eugenics: When scientists become completely insane!

Michael Crichton
Michael Crichton

Michael Crichton says:
“Imagine that there is a new scientific theory that warns of an impending crisis, and points to a way out…

This theory quickly draws support from leading scientists, politicians and celebrities around the world. Research is funded by distinguished philanthropies, and carried out at prestigious universities. The crisis is reported frequently in the media. The science is taught in college and high school classrooms…

Nobel Prize winners gave support. Research was backed by the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations. The Cold Springs Harbor Institute was built to carry out this research, but important work was also done at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and Johns Hopkins. Legislation to address the crisis was passed in states from New York to California…

These efforts had the support of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association, and the National Research Council.”
Read it all at:

See also:

charlotteUNCC treats this topic as if it were consigned to the past:
These ideas resonated with a wide spectrum of people from all political backrounds. After all, it was scientific! Grant’s book was praised by his friend, former president Theodore Roosevelt, who wrote: “The book is a capital book: in purpose, in vision, in grasp of the facts that our people must need to realize…. It is the work of an American scholar and gentleman, and all Americans should be grateful to you for writing it.” Much depends, obviously, on how one interprets words like “elimination” and “worthless race types”. The Passing of the Great Race was translated into German in 1925, and Grant received a fan letter from aspiring politician Adolf Hitler as well: “The book is my Bible,” wrote Hitler to Grant.

natureAnd, lest anyone should complain Nature was not mentioned as part of this scientific fiasco: “Following the first leaders on eugenics in the 1920s, Nature continued to explore the merits of selective birth-control methods and the 1930s saw some of the strongest opinions ever aired in the magazine. Leader writers such as E. W. MacBride took issue with the over-reproduction by the working classes: “To-day, however stupid, they [the working class poor] survive and constitute an increasing proportion of the future nation”. Over-population made England “a steam-boiler with an increasing pressure and no safety valve” and “compulsory birth control seems to us to be the only remedy…” Nature supported Major Church’s bill, which proposed to legalize voluntary sterilization, and English statistician and geneticist R. A. Fisher’s plan to raise the fertility of the middle classes…” “Francis Galton, the forefather of eugenics, originally intended to improve human condition by breeding out what he saw as undesirable traits. Eugenics became a science whereupon knowledge of human genetics was applied to social problems.”

Wiki: Sir Francis Galton, FRS (16 February 1822 – 17 January 1911), cousin of Douglas Strutt Galton, cousin of Charles Darwin, was an English Victorian polymath: anthropologist, eugenicist, tropical explorer, geographer, inventor, meteorologist, proto-geneticist, psychometrician, and statistician. He was knighted in 1909.

Human_Sterilization_TodayBritish Eugenics Society

American Eugenics Society

Human Betterment Foundation

Eugenics is replaced by Human Culling:
Meeting Doctor Doom and more insanity
Dr. Eric R. Pianka again
Citizen Scientist | March 31, 2006
by Forrest M. Mims III.
“Recently citizen scientist Forrest Mims told me about a speech he heard at the Texas Academy of Science during which the speaker, a world-renowned ecologist, (Dr. Eric R. Pianka) advocated for the extermination of 90 percent of the human species in a most horrible and painful manner. Apparently at the speaker’s direction, the speech was not video taped by the Academy and so Forrest’s may be the only record of what was said. Forrest’s account of what he witnessed chilled my soul. Astonishingly, Forrest reports that many of the Academy members present gave the speaker a standing ovation. To date, the Academy has not moved to sanction the speaker or distance itself from the speaker’s remarks.

If the professional community has lost its sense of moral outrage when one if their own openly calls for the slow and painful extermination of over 5 billion human beings, then it falls upon the amateur community to be the conscience of science.”

What we have here is the, not unusual, breathtaking arrogance of scientists. Imposing their extreme opinions, not just upon science, but telling the rest of us who should live and who should die.
It’s a strange thing, but I’ve not heard from any scientist who thinks with hindsight, that the genes of those who advocate eugenics, mass human extermination, frontal lobotomies or those scientists who research new weapons of mass destruction should also be erased from the gene pool. Not even a mention from the psychologists that these mad buggers should be confined to a rubber room. But of course, this is the ‘neutrality of science’ we are speaking of, where neutral madness abounds.

population_controlUniversity College’s Emeritus Professor John Guillebaud, has shown us (quite literally) another glimpse into the true nature of these neo-Malthusians when he spoke in front of a group of scientists at Cambridge University’s Triple Helix Society on October 14, 2010.

On the top of the screen of Guillebaud’s slide show we read the words: “guide to “population control” methods”, showing on the one hand a contraception pill, which is described as an artificial method of population control. On the right hand side we see depicted a machine-gun, a knife, and a hospitable-bed as examples of “natural” methods of population control.”

The cause of overpopulation is poverty, but scientists with good jobs for life call it  faulty genetics. The D in Ph.D. now indicates a certain mental defectiveness, as the owner of such a credential has become unable think outside of the consensus box. (voluntary madness)

Wiki: Herd mentality, or mob mentality
“Herd mentality implies a fear-based reaction to peer pressure which makes individuals act in order to avoid feeling “left behind” from the group.”

Wiki: Groupthink Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people, in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an incorrect or deviant decision-making outcome.”

cullingWiki on Murder:
Murder due to Insanity
Mental disorder may apply to a wide range of disorders including psychosis caused by schizophrenia and dementia, and excuse the person from the need to undergo the stress of a trial as to liability. Usually, sociopathy and other personality disorders are not legally considered insanity, because of the belief they are the result of free will in many societies… In some jurisdictions, following the pre-trial hearing to determine the extent of the disorder, the defence of “not guilty by reason of insanity” may be used to get a not guilty verdict.[31] This defence has two elements:
That the defendant had a serious mental illness, disease, or defect.
That the defendant’s mental condition, at the time of the killing, rendered the perpetrator unable to determine right from wrong, or that what he or she was doing was wrong.

Wiki: Unlike people with major mental disorders such as schizophrenia, psychopaths can seem normal and often quite charming, a state of adaptation that psychiatrist Hervey Cleckley called the “mask of sanity”.

Prescription opioids
Overdose deaths involving prescription opioids were five times higher in 2016 than 1999, and sales of these prescription drugs have quadrupled. From 1999 to 2016, more than 200,000 people have died in the U.S. from overdoses related to prescription opioids.

Opioid prescribing continues to fuel the epidemic. Today, 40% of all U.S. opioid overdose deaths involve a prescription opioid. In 2016, more than 46 people died every day from overdoses involving prescription opioids.

SCIENCE: Cull the human race – Australian scientist
This guy has quite a few ideas guaranteed  to intrigue the budding scientific psychopath.

The Digging Dog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.