Climate Change and Energy – Scam

The Climate Change and Energy Scam

NOTHING TRUE IS POPULAR AND NOTHING POPULAR IS TRUE
Theoria Apophasis
Science is very popular so mind where you tread

climate change4

“Pollution sucks. It’s just that, presently, climate science does too.”

deviantart.com: “We must stop pollution for reasons of biosphere toxicity, NOT because of climate change. The TSI model of solar forcing ignores nearly all climate forcing aspects of space weather AND applies that forcing to the human total. This video shows that fact in a way that anyone can understand. Pollution sucks. It’s just that, presently, climate science does too.”
Video: Fatal Flaw In Climate Change Science

Personally I would go along with climate change even though I’m convinced it’s a political scam. I would go along if anything was actually being done to combat the very real and seriously toxic atmospheric pollution. ..no one is doing anything. Switching to electric cars is simply moving fossil fuel burning from the car to the fossil fuel burning power station – not an answer.

As for nuclear, we all know what happened in Japan recently and as if one nuclear disaster were not enough we should by now be aware of the many other disasters at home and abroad. There are clean cheap alternatives but these have  been blocked by the energy dictatorship. Click for an alternative to dirty nuclear reactors.


galen_winsor
Galen Winsor

The Alternative Galen Winsor

With regard to energy we are being deceived in so many ways it’s hard for the layman to decide; and that is the complete intention.  We are inundated with lies and I encourage readers to do some research of their own.
From the Video below: “Galen Winsor is a nuclear physicist of renown who worked at, and helped design, nuclear power plants in Hanford, WA; Oak Ridge, TN; Morris, IL, San Jose, CA; Wimington, NJ. Among his positions of expertise he was in charge of measuring and controlling the nuclear fuel inventory and storage.

Galen Winsor has traveled and lectured all over America, spoken on national talk radio, and made several videos exposing the misunderstood issues of nuclear radiation. He shows that fear of radiation has been exaggerated to scare people … so a few powerful people can maintain total control of the world’s most valuable power resource. Filmed by Ben Williams in 1986.”
Watch the video and then make-up your own mind: Galen Winsor: The Nuclear Scare Scam


 

Carl_Sagan
Carl Sagan

Origin of Climate Change

Climate change or Global Warming as it was called was an invention contrived by astronomer Carl Sagan in order to win a debunking argument against Immanuel Velikovsky about the cause of the high temperature of Venus’ atmosphere.
You can read about it here: Venusian Weapon of Scientific Slaying

 

 


climate change3
07 Apr 1923 – NORTH POLE MELTING. CHANGE OF CLIMATE. MANY GLAC…https://climatism.blog/2013/12/16/in-case-you-forgot-for-a-minute-that-nasa-climate-science-is-a-complete-fraud/

 

The phrase ‘Climate Change’ suggests that climate was       unchanging and stable but then at some point in time it changed, which is just about the opposite to what climate actually does. Climate is constantly changing, it would not be climate were it not for change and so the phrase is meaningless. It is undisputed that the Sahara desert was once lush with greenery and that the Arctic once supported tropical flora, that the Vikings once farmed Greenland. The phrase “climate change” is a strawman, used by climatologists to provoke some kind of emotional diversion as opposed to scientific facts.

Let’s ask a question about a reverse scenario: How do ice sheets get to be on far Northern and Southern lands, North America, Greenland, Russia and Antarctica? We will ignore North polar sea ice. It gets there due to heat, yes heat and so in a warming period we would expect more (not less) ice on far Northern and Southern lands. The Sun evaporates the ocean water and drops it down on the land. In a cooler period it is certainly possible to have a colder North and/or South but there will be less ice deposited. This has been known for a hundred years or more. when there was less politics and propaganda in science. In fact the scientists of the day even calculated the amount of energy required to move the water. It turns-out that the amount of heat required to transport ice from the oceans to the poles is equal to that of melting iron of the same volume – a lot of heat.  If we assume this to be true then climatologists should be looking for more and (not less) ice cover on land. Has anyone reported increased ice cover on land? I don’t think so because that would spoil the propaganda.

In the light of the above what climate mechanism could cause the ice sheets to retreat – is it warming or cooling?

See: https://serc.carleton.edu/eslabs/weather/2a.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.